The Use of Antisense Oligonucleotides for Gene Silencing
By: Emily Mitchell Sontag, PhD
Huntington disease (HD) is caused by a single gene mutation and is therefore a good candidate for therapeutic gene silencing. While many potential HD therapeutic agents focus on ameliorating toxic effects following intracellular production of the mutant huntingtin protein (mHtt), gene silencing would disrupt the production of mHtt and could be the ultimate disease-modifying therapy for HD by preventing the toxic effects of mHtt. This article highlights some promising data from gene silencing and potential translational hurdles.
Gene silencing offers many potential benefits. First, gene silencing does not require investigators to determine the exact mechanism by which mHtt causes disease. In addition, with gene silencing, the toxic effects of mHtt would be countered by the disruption of intracellular mHtt production. Finally, gene silencing therapies would remove any toxicity associated with mutant mRNA.
The use of antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) is a promising approach to gene silencing. ASOs are small single-stranded pieces of DNA that bind via complementary base-pair binding to the intracellular mRNA transcript (Figure). In HD, ASOs prevent the transcription of mHtt. ASOs have been found to reduce a number of different mHtt-associated abnormalities in animal models of HD1.
A recent study showed that infusion of ASOs targeting mHtt into the brains of mouse models of HD could alleviate motor symptoms, prevent brain loss and increase survival rates1. The benefits of the ASO treatment persisted after the production of mHtt had returned to pre-treatment levels.
This effect, termed a “huntingtin holiday” by Carl Johnson of the Hereditary Disease Foundation, suggests that it may be possible for relatively less frequent ASO treatments to give lasting benefit for patients. The study also found that infusion of ASOs into the cerebrospinal fluid delivered the ASOs to the brain and lowered mHtt mRNA levels in most brain regions in non-human primates. This method of delivery could be safer for human patients than direct intracerebral injection and may affect a wider range of brain tissues. This second point is significant because many research groups have shown that HD neuronal pathology is not limited to the striatum.
Despite the promise of gene silencing, challenges remain. First, the effect of reducing the levels of normal Htt, along with mHtt, is unclear. The majority of people with HD have one copy of the normal Htt gene and one copy of the mHtt gene. Htt is known to be essential in early development2, 3 and may be necessary for the survival of particular adult neurons4. Even though reducing Htt levels appears to be well tolerated in rodents and nonhuman primates, 5, 6, 7 it is possible that the human brain is more sensitive than animal brains to reduced Htt levels.
One solution may be to target only the mutant HD gene for gene silencing, using ASOs or RNAi approaches. Several groups have utilized different approaches, including taking advantage of slight structural differences between mHtt mRNA and Htt mRNA8, or targeting mutations (polymorphisms) other than the expanded CAG repeat in the HD gene9. Additionally, other genes in the human genome also contain CAG repeats, but specifically targeting the mutant gene also appears to reduce “off-target” effects.
Delivery is another potential roadblock for gene silencing techniques. It is not known whether spinal infusions will achieve the same widespread distribution of ASO in the much larger human brain, as that achieved in the brain of rodent and non-human primates. Convection enhanced delivery (CED)10 is a potential delivery approach that uses high pressure to deliver molecules deep into the brain. CED requires the insertion of tubes through the skull and into the brain, after which a pump is attached. This approach is obviously challenging from the patient’s perspective. It may also prove difficult for surgeons to accurately place tubes into the brains of symptomatic HD patients, who typically suffer significant loss of brain volume.
The optimal timing and treatment regimen for HD patients is also not known. Studies suggest that relatively early treatments are more beneficial; however, tracking the benefits of a treatment administered before the appearance of symptoms remains difficult. Groups worldwide are working to establish more quantifiable indicators of early symptoms of HD. Further, even though ASO treatment in animal models reduced symptoms for longer than expected, human patients must deal with the disease for decades, and it is not known how often a “booster” might be needed for continued benefit.
A number of clinical trials utilizing ASOs have been completed, and more are currently underway. Previous trials have used ASOs for the treatment of various cancers, asthma, arthritis, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Crohn’s disease, heart disease and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The ALS clinical trial is of particular interest because it uses spinal infusion for the delivery of ASOs. Phase I of this clinical trial was completed in early 2012, and its results may provide information on the safety of ASO spinal infusion.
Many different gene silencing techniques are being used to lower mHtt expression in animal models of HD. RNA-based strategies, including short-hairpin RNAs (shRNA)11; small interfering RNAs (siRNA)2; and microRNAs (miRNA)3, also show promise in alleviating mHtt-mediated phenotypes. Some of these strategies are moving toward human clinical trials. Despite the challenges of gene silencing, ASO therapy and other mHtt knockdown approaches for HD remain exciting avenues of treatment. Each new development brings us closer to the discovery of disease-modifying therapy for HD.
1 Kordasiewicz HB, Stanek LM, Wancewicz EV, et al. Sustained Therapeutic Reversal of Huntington’s Disease by Transient Repression of Huntingtin Synthesis. Neuron2012 Jun 21;74(6): 1031-44.
2 Nasir J, Floresco SB, O’Kusky JR, et al. Targeted disruption of the Huntington’s disease gene results in embryonic lethality and behavioral and morphological changes in heterozygotes. Cell. 1995 Jun;81(5):811-23.
3 Zeitlin S, Liu JP, Chapman DL, et al. Increased apoptosis and early embryonic lethality in mice nullizygous for the Huntington’s disease gene homologue. Nature Gen. 1995 Oct; 11(2):155-63.
4 Dragatsis I, Levine MS, Zeitlin S. Inactivation of Hdh in the brain and testis results in progressive neurodegeneration and sterility in mice. Nature Gen. 2000 Nov;26(3):300-6.
5 Boudreau RL, McBride JL, Martins I, et al. Nonallele-specific silencing of mutant and wild-type huntingtin demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in Huntington’s disease mice. Molecula therapy. 2009 Jun;17(6):1053-63.
6 Grondin R, Kaytor MD, Ai Y,et al. Six-month partial suppression of Huntingtin is well tolerated in the adult rhesus striatum. Brain. 2012 April;135(4):1197-209.
7 McBride JL, Pitzer MR, Boudreau RL, et al. Preclinical safety of RNAi-mediated HTT suppression in the rhesus macaque as a potential therapy for Huntington’s disease. Molecular therapy. 2011 Dec;19(12):2152-62.
8 Gagnon KT, Pendergraff HM, Deleavey GF, et al. Alleleselective inhibition of mutant huntingtin expression with antisense oligonucleotides targeting the expanded CAG repeat. Biochemistry. 2010 Nov 30;49(47):10166-78.
9 Carroll JB, Warby SC, Southwell AL, et al. Potent and selective antisense oligonucleotides targeting single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the Huntington disease gene/allele-specific silencing of mutant huntingtin. Mol Ther 2011 Dec;19(12): 2178-85.
10 Stiles DK, Zhang Z, Ge P, Nelson B, et al. Widespread suppression of huntingtin with convection-enhanced delivery of siRNA. Exper Neurol 2012; 233(1):463-71.
11 Harper SQ, Staber PD, He X, et al. RNA interference improves motor and neuropathological abnormalities in a Huntington’s disease mouse model. Proc Nat Acad Sc USA. 2005 Apr;102(16): 5820-5. 12 DiFiglia M, Sena-Esteves M, Chase K, et al. Therapeutic silencing of mutant huntingtin with siRNA attenuates striatal and cortical neuropathology and behavioral deficits. Proc Nat Acad Sc USA. 2007 Oct; 104(43):17204-9.
13 McBride JL, Boudreau RL, Harper SQ, et al. Artificial miRNAs mitigate shRNA-mediated toxicity in the brain: implications for the therapeutic development of RNAi. Proc Nat Acad Sc USA. 2008 Apr;105(15):5868-73.